Category Archives: Category_Calls for Papers

CfP: Reimagining Care: Narratives of Gender and Healthcare (Publication): by: 15.01.2026

Laura de la Parra Fernández (UCM) (Web) and David Yagüe González (MIT) (Web)

Proposals by: 15.01.2026

Healthcare and care provision have long been influenced by gendered dynamics. Whether in access to treatment, diagnosis, or the dominant narratives about body normativity, access to care remains unevenly distributed. The inclusion of women in health trials was not consistently considered until the NHS Revitalization Act of 1993; however, to this day, other structural factors, such as race, ethnicity, or class, remain underrepresented in clinical studies (Kwiatkowski et al., 2013). In patient-centered care, which emphasizes patients’ autonomy and overall well-being (Reynolds 2009), it is essential to consider both structural and individual factors. Similarly, care provision remains highly underpaid, undervalued, and gendered in a neoliberal society (Gerstel 467). The “crisis of care” articulated by Nancy Fraser (2016) illustrates this paradox: capitalism demands higher productivity and lower spending, while care work becomes invisible and conflicts with neoliberal time regimes. At the same time, the idea that care and nurturing are inherently tied to femininity continues to essentialize and devalue a fundamental aspect of society (Gerstel 468).
In turn, narrative has reflected, contested, and reimagined these dynamics, providing insight into how gender influences experiences of well-being, illness, and healing. As Louise Hide and Joanna Burke explain, care produces “subjective experiences in relation to notions of, for example, ‘vulnerability’, ‘trust’, ‘need’, ‘dependency’, and ‘interdependency’, ‘consent’ and ‘harm’” (684). Narrative offers a privileged perspective from which to examine such experiences of care, enabling us to explore their effects, recognize silenced voices, and foster change toward achieving a “care democracy” (Tronto 2013). Recent studies on the medical humanities highlight the diverse applications and potential of narrative in clinical settings. Following Ronald Schleifer and Jerry Vannatta, “training and practice in grasping the local and global meanings in a literary narrative is excellent practice for listening to and comprehending patients’ histories of present illness” (xxxiv).
This volume seeks to interrogate how illness narratives expose the entanglement of care with systemic harm, and how these texts imagine possibilities for healing and care otherwise. We invite chapter proposals for an edited volume that explores the intersections of gender, healthcare, and narrative across various contexts, periods, genres, and media, with an emphasis on its applications in medical training. We also seek contributions about Continue reading

CfP: Coping with Disappointments: Female Mobility between Expectations and Experiences (17th to 20th Centuries) (05/2026, Paris); by: 31.01.2025

Jan Simon Karstens, Eva Seemann, and Hannah Tulay; German Historical Institute Paris (Web)

Time: 29.05.2026
Venue: Paris – and virtuel space
Proposals by: 31.01.2026

It is indisputable that experiences of mobility and migration have been part of the reality of life for many women and girls – not only in recent history. The mobility of women, whether as daughters, wives, or widows, as workers, nuns, entrepreneurs, or activists, was associated not only with gender-specific expectations, but often also with specific experiences that varied depending on factors such as social and geographical origin, status, age, religious, ethnic, and family affiliation.
The planned workshop at the German Historical Institute in Paris picks up on this and asks how historical actors reflected on, interpreted, and communicated experiences of mobility that contradicted previous expectations. We want to engage in a trans-epochal dialogue and therefore invite contributions from the early modern period to contemporary history.
The history of gender-specific mobility, especially female mobility, has become an established topic of historical research over the past twenty years. In contrast to older assumptions, recent research has not only revealed the extensive extent of female mobility but has also highlighted the wide range of different experiences of women and girls. The spectrum ranges from female educational and marital mobility, to urban-rural migration of female servants and other forms of labor mobility, to mobility in the context of family migration or political activism, whether in local or cross-border settings. Recent work has mostly emphasized female agency and the opportunities and possibilities associated with mobility, such as securing a livelihood, social advancement, and self-determination. However, women’s mobility often came with particular constraints, challenges, and disappointments that influenced their experiences and decision-making processes and, in turn, shaped future expectations and retrospective memories. Explicit forms of forced mobility (e.g., expulsion, flight, slavery) are not to be included here.
The tension that arises between individual and societal expectations and contradictory experiences will be explored in greater depth during the workshop. Continue reading

CfP: Agents of change: Folk cultures in the long 20th century (06/2026, Brno); by: 19.12.2025

„Beyond the Village. Folk Cultures as Agents of Modernity, 1918-1945,“ a project funded by the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR) (Web)

Time: 18.-19.06.2026
Venue: Masaryk Univ. Brno
Proposals by: 19.12.2025

Folk art and cultures have often been seen as passive, unchanging, and frozen in a preindustrial era, linked with ideas such as nostalgia, decoration, and kitsch. From this point of view, grounded in late 19th and early 20th-century nationalist and modernist discourses, folk art seems to be a relic of the past that cannot respond to the challenges of modern societies, let alone contribute to social change.
There is another perspective – one that, admittedly, has received much less attention: numerous publications, exhibitions, institutions, and movements around the globe have recognised folk art as a continuous and contemporary practice with the potential to emancipate and activate individuals and groups. Ranging from projects dedicated to wellbeing and mental health to activist interventions from all sides of the political spectrum, folk art is connected to class, gender, and ethnic divisions, regional and national identities, as well as decolonial and economic emancipation. Far removed from the limiting associations with preindustrial traditionalism and decorativeness, it instead can be understood as an agent of change in both past and contemporary practices.
The workshop turns attention to folk craftspeople and artisans that have actively engaged with social upheavals, market shifts, government policies, and technological advances around the globe from the late 19th century to the present. Building on the idea of agency in folk art, the workshop welcomes papers that offer new perspectives on the meanings of folk art throughout the long 20th century in various geographical and political contexts. With the goal of developing new theoretical frameworks for the study of folk art across disciplines, the workshop seeks to open a long-overdue debate about the role of folk art in contributing to political, social, and economic change during the long 20th century. It asks:

– How do folk cultures interact with politics and ideologies through specific actors, from the extreme right to alternative subcultures, from conformity to resistance?
– How does folk art serve as a tool for emancipation and oppression? Continue reading

CfP: Joining the Dots. Akteur:innen, Netzwerke und das soziale Gefüge von Höfen und Städten im Spätmittelalter und in der Frühen Neuzeit (04/2026, Wien); bis: 10.01.2026

SFB „Managing Maximilian“, Institut für Mittelalterforschung/MIR, Österr. Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) (Web)

Zeit: 09.-10.04.2026
Ort: ÖAW/IMAFO, Georg-Coch-Pl. 2, Wien
Einreichfrist: 10.01.2026

Der SFB „Managing Maximilian (1493–1519) – Persona, Politics and Personnel through the Lens of Digital Prosopography“ verfolgt einen neuen interpretativen Zugang zu Maximilians Herrschaft, vormodernem Regieren und Regierungshandeln, indem er systematisch alle Verwaltungsebenen und alle in den Dokumenten der Kanzleien Maximilians I. namentlich erwähnten Akteur:innen der ausgedehnten Herrschaft Maximilians I. unter die Lupe nimmt. So sollen die vielen „hinter“ dem Kaiser bzw. in dessen Namen und Auftrag tätigen Personen und Personengruppen, die den medial als „Universalgenie“ dargestellten Maximilian „gemanagt“ haben, sichtbar gemacht werden – von hochrangigen Mitgliedern des Hofes mit persönlichen Verbindungen zum Herrscher bis hin zu Maultiertreibern.
Eines der zentralen Forschungsergebnisse des SFB wird daher die open access verfügbare prosopographische Datensammlung APIS sein. In diese werden nicht nur Personen, die sich am Hof bzw. im breiteren Umfeld des Kaisers bewegten, sondern auch deren Familienmitglieder, Ämter, Aufenthaltsorte, Werke, usw. aufgenommen. Die Eingabe erfolgt in Form von so genannten „Factoids“: kurzen, entweder aus der Sekundärliteratur, aus edierten Quellen oder direkt aus historischen Originalen gewonnenen biographischen Daten.
Am Ende einer ersten vierjährigen Arbeitsphase (Anfang 2027) soll ein plastisches und komplexes Bild Maximilians I., seiner Regierung, seines Hofes und vor allem der ihn umgebenden Personen – seiner Familie, seiner Höflinge, der Mitglieder des Frauenzimmers sowie der unterschiedlichen Amtsträger und Bediensteten beiderlei Geschlechts – vorliegen. Danach wird etwa Mark Grannoveters Theorie der schwachen Verbindungen („weak ties“) im „maximilianischen Netzwerk“ zu diskutieren und auch zu untersuchen sein, welche Personen als entscheidende Knotenpunkte („hubs“) einzustufen sind, da laut seiner These schwache Beziehungen – z. B. Bekanntschaften, die nicht durch viele gemeinsame Freundschaften gestärkt werden – für Informationsflüsse besonders wichtig sind.
Im Rahmen unseres Workshops möchten wir vor allem jüngeren Continue reading

CfP: Gender_Queer Worldings: Gewalt, Bündnisse, Zukunftsentwürfe (09/2026, Innsbruck); bis: 28.02.2026

11. Tagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Geschlechterforschung (ÖGGF) (Web)

Zeit: 23.-25.09.2026
Ort: Innsbruck
Einreichfrist: 28.02.2026

Version auf Deutsch: In einer Welt, die durch das Aufeinandertreffen multipler ökonomischer, demokratiepolitischer und ökologischer Krisen und durch das Erstarken autokratischer Systeme gekennzeichnet ist und in der Angriffe auf das Leben von Frauen*, trans*, inter*, non-binären und queeren Personen sowie auf feministische, queere und trans* Politiken zunehmen, sind die Gender Studies mehr denn je gefordert, gesellschaftliche Veränderungen zu analysieren sowie alternative Zukunftsszenarien zu entwickeln. Die Konferenz Gender_Queer Worldings befasst sich mit den vielfältigen Weisen, wie Welten geschaffen und gestaltet werden. Unter Worlding verstehen wir Formen der Weltgestaltung und -erzeugung und somit die dynamischen Prozesse, durch die Realitäten ins Leben gerufen, aufrechterhalten, angefochten und neu gedacht werden. Welt(en) verstehen wir dabei nicht als gegeben, sondern durch Beziehungen von Macht, Sorge, Gewalt und Widerstand hervorgebracht und auch veränderbar. Im Zentrum stehen die Fragen, wie Welten durch gewaltförmige Strukturen wie Patriarchat, Cis-Heteronormativität, Rassismus, Kolonialismus, Kapitalismus und Ableismus erzeugt und aufrechterhalten werden und wie feministische, crip, queere, trans*, inter* sowie post- und dekoloniale Praktiken, Politiken, Aktivismen und Wissenschaften Räume für denk- und lebbare Utopien und Zukunftsvisionen eröffnen können. Weiterlesen … (PDF)

English version: In a world shaped by the convergence of multiple crises of economy, democracy, ecology, and the rise of authoritarian systems, accompanied by attacks on women, queer, non-binary and trans people as well as feminist, queer, and trans politics, it is imperative for gender studies to both analyse these transformations and imagine alternative futures. The conference, centred on ‘Gender_Queer Worldings’, engages with the various ways in which worlds are made and shaped. With the concept of ‘worldings’ we refer to the dynamic processes through which realities are enacted, maintained, contested, and reimagined, attending to how worlds are not given but continuously produced through relations of power, care, violence, and resistance. The conference focuses on how worlds are produced and maintained through structures of violence, such as patriarchy, cis-heteronormativity, racism, colonialism, capitalism, and ability-centrism, and how feminist, queer, crip, trans, post- and decolonial practices, politics, activisms, and scholarship might open up spaces for utopias and futurities. Read more… (PDF).

CfP: Trans Media Studies (Publication); by: 28.02.2026

Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft | Journal of Media Studies 35 (2/2026) (Web)

Einreichfrist | Proposals by: 28.02.2026

Version auf Deutsch: Fragen der Mediatisierung, insbesondere der (medialen) Sichtbarkeit und deren Folgen, bestimmen in besonderem Maße die Diskursivierung von trans* Erfahrungen. Ausgehend von den USA wird Mitte der 2010er Jahre mit dem sogenannten Transgender Tipping Point eine gesteigerte (affirmative) mediale Darstellung von trans* Geschlechtlichkeiten mit potenzieller politischer Handlungsfähigkeit verbunden. 2025 dominieren Fragen nach der Gewalt durch und in mediale(r) Exposition den Diskurs. Mit dem Erstarken autoritärer Kräfte sind trans*, inter* und geschlechtsnonkonforme Personen mit der Fortsetzung diskriminierender Politiken konfrontiert, sie werden zu einem der zentralen Feindbilder repressiv-reaktionärer Rhetorik und Politik gegen körperliche und geschlechtliche Selbstbestimmung. Die aktuelle Zuspitzung lässt sich als Ausweitung einer Gewalt verstehen, der sich z. B. BIPoC trans* Personen schon lange ausgesetzt sehen, wie Ansätze aus der Queer und Trans of Color Critique insbesondere mit Blick auf das ambivalente Verhältnis von Invisibilität, Hypervisualität und Vulnerabilität herausgearbeitet haben. Weiterlesen … (PDF)

English version: Issues of mediatization, in particular (media) visibility and its consequences, are formative for a broad range of discourses surrounding trans experiences. While increased (affirmative) media representation of trans people became associated with potential political agency in the mid-2010s – famously coined in the US as the Transgender Tipping Point –, in 2025, these discourses are dominated by questions of violence through and in media exposure. With the rise of authoritarian forces, discriminatory policies against trans, inter, and gender-nonconforming people do not only continue, but also make them the central target of a demonizing and reactionary rhetoric, and of repressive politics against bodily and gender self-determination. This escalation can be understood as an extension of violence. BIPoC trans people, for example, have long been and continue to be exposed to severe gendered and racialized violence and discrimination. In queer and trans of color critique, various approaches have been analyzing these conditions for years, particularly with regard to the ambivalent relation of invisibility, hypervisibility, and vulnerability. Read more (scroll down) … (PDF)

Source: Gender Campus

CfP: Beyond Borders: Black-Indigenous Encounters between Audre Lorde and Antonina Kymytval (Publication); by: 01.02.2026

The Archive Revisited Gazette (Web)

Proposals by: 01.02.2026

Following the Beyond Borders meeting series hosted by the WGSS Department at the Univ. of South Florida (Web), we warmly invite submissions for a special issue of The Archive Revisited Gazette celebrating Chukchee poet Antonina Kymytval’ and her brief but profoundly resonant encounter with Audre Lorde during the 1976 Afro-Asian Writers Conference in Tashkent. Lorde’s essay “Notes from a Trip to Russia” (Sister Outsider, 1984) and her poem “Political Relations” (Our Dead Behind Us, 1986) offer the only detailed accounts of this meeting, providing a rich starting point for reflection, creative engagement, and critical exploration.
This special issue invites contributors to explore the intertwined legacies of Black and Indigenous feminist Internationalism, shining a light on the intimate and often overlooked connections that transcend Cold War boundaries. At its heart, the issue celebrates Kymytval’s poetics, Indigenous resilience, and the bold, affective solidarities she shared with Audre Lorde—what Lorde evocatively described as “making love…through our interpreters.”

We invite contributions that illuminate or respond to:
– Antonina Kymytval’s poetry, especially its reflections on land, loss, survival, and relationality
– Kymytval’s role in Soviet Indigenous literary history and the tensions she navigated within Soviet assimilationist policies
– The erotic, intimate, and political dimensions of Lorde and Kymytval’s encounter, including the constraints of language, Cold War politics, and the briefness of their meeting
– How Lorde’s and Kymytval’s relationship invites us to rethink dominant East/West geopolitical frameworks
– Transnational feminist solidarities across racialized and colonized spaces
– Indigenous and Black poetic traditions as living archives of Internationalism
– Archival traces of Kymytval’ and the exciting possibilities for re-engaging with and re-reading her work today Continue reading

CfP: Interdisziplinäre Männlichkeitenforschung: Bestandsaufnahme und aktuelle Herausforderungen (06/2026, Stuttgart); bis: 09.01.2026 [REMINDERIN]

Arbeitskreis für interdisziplinäre Männer- und Geschlechterforschung AIM GENDER, Fachbereich Geschichte, Akademie der Diözese Rottenburg-Stuttgart (Web)

Zeit: 18.-20.06.2026
Ort: Stuttgart
Einreichfrist: 09.01.2026

Ziel des Arbeitskreises AIM GENDER ist die fächerübergreifende gegenseitige Wahrnehmung und Kooperation von Forschenden aus Geschichts-, Literatur-, Kultur- und Politikwissenschaften sowie Soziologie, die zum Thema Männlichkeiten und deren Auswirkungen auf Kultur und Gesellschaft in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart arbeiten. Beiträge aus anderen Fachrichtungen sind willkommen.

25 Jahre Arbeitskreis AIM GENDER
2026 kann AIM GENDER auf 25 Jahre regelmäßige Treffen zurückblicken, die dazu beitrugen, die interdisziplinäre kritische Männlichkeitenforschung sichtbar zu etablieren. Selten lag der Forschungsgegenstand in dieser Zeit so klar in seiner gesellschaftlichen Relevanz vor Augen wie gegenwärtig. Ob wir eine „masculine energy“ beschwören wollen, wie Mark Zuckerberg dies tut, oder am permanenten Ringen um Männlichkeit des Schriftstellers Karl Ove Knausgård in seinen literarischen Texten teilhaben, ob in den Feuilletons über eine „toxische Männlichkeit“ diskutiert wird oder ob wir dem Ringen um die Vorherrschaft in der augenblicklichen „Broligarchie“ in den USA zusehen: Männlichkeit ist längst aus der Unsichtbarkeit des Selbstverständlichen herausgetreten. Zentrale Begriffe und Kategorien wurden in über zwei Dekaden kritischer Männlichkeitenforschung entwickelt und sind in die öffentlichen Debatten eingeflossen, andere drängen gerade aus dem politischen in das wissenschaftliche Feld ein. Der für den akademischen Blick so wichtige Plural findet inzwischen auch in den Lebenswelten Beachtung und Anerkennung, zugleich entzünden sich an ihm nach wie vor immer neue Kontroversen.
Wir wollen das 25. Jubiläum des Arbeitskreises für interdisziplinäre Männer- und Geschlechterforschung zum Anlass nehmen, um die Verhandlung von Männlichkeiten in der Forschung und in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung zu diskutieren. Bei dieser Gelegenheit wollen wir erstens (selbst-)kritisch auf die Entwicklung des akademischen Felds zurückblicken,  Continue reading

CfP: Self(less)-Care: Ancient and Contemporary Care Ethics from a Labor Perspective (05/2026, Pardubice); by: 15.12.2025

Research project „Loving is Caring. Towards a Platonic Care Ethics“, Univ. of Pardubice (Web)

Time: 15.05.2026
Venue: Univ. of Pardubice, Czech Republic
Proposals by: 15.12.2025

  • Keynote speaker: Stella Sandford (Manchester Metropolitan Univ., UK)

In 1982 Michel Foucault concluded his lectures at the Collège de France by reflecting on our contemporary fascination with the Delphic maxim “Know thyself” (gnôthi seauton). Thus, he invited his audience to “remember that the rule that one should know oneself was regularly combined with the theme of care of the self” (2005, p.491). The widespread proliferation of public discourse on care over the past forty years exhibits a newfound contemporary fascination with care, especially self-care, worth problematizing.
In this conference, we aim to address the relational dimension of self-care, taking the ancient care of the self (epimeleia heautou, cura sui) as a point of departure for engaging contemporary care ethics in critical discussion of self-care from a labor perspective. The consolidation of contemporary care ethics has seen the simultaneous rising popularity of self-care literature that mobilizes care while dismissing relational interdependence – one of the central tenets of care ethics (Gilligan, 1982; Noddings, 1984; Kittay & Meyers, 1987). This dismissal needs explanation. In this respect, the ancient care of the self offers a unique analytical opportunity because it amounts to a version of care ethics that similarly seems to dismiss the relationality and interdependence that go into care, especially if understood from a labor perspective. Whereas ancient “freemen” committed to the theorization and practice of the care of the self, it was enslaved and women’s domestic labor that allowed for the care for the soul (epimeleia tês psuchês in Plato’s terms), which distinguished “freemen” from a bunch of “careless” others: enslaved people, women, foreigners (barbarians), children, and animals. This conference asks if similar logics of othering run within contemporary self-care.
Tellingly, Plutarch relates that Anaxandridas, the Spartan king, faced with the question as to why the Helots (forced laborers) tended to the fields, rather than the Spartans themselves, answered that “we acquired these lands not to take care [epimeloumenoi] of them, but of ourselves [autôn]” (Apophthegmata. 10.3). This helps illuminate the usually unacknowledged labor that upholds self-care, and raises questions concerning the scope of ancient and contemporary notions of self-care: namely, are these notions commensurable? While the ancient care of the self rested on exploitative relations, contemporary self-care rather seems to help the exploited further endure exploitation. Also, if self-care indeed depends on the concealed care labor of others, can we really conceive of a care that ends at the limits of the self? Should we not extend our versions of self-care to account for this labor? And would this extended version of self-care entail cultivating a selfless self (Varela, 1991), which acknowledges the always already implicated care labor of others?
This conference aims to address such questions and envision a care of the self that is not mobilized in the service of “othering” those whose forced/unpaid care labor prevents them from engaging in self-care. Maybe then we can manage to decenter the self in self-care and foster a self(less)-care that centers selflessness instead.

Possible topics include:
– Ancient and/or contemporary self-care from a labor perspective
– “Carelessness” as an ancient and/or contemporary mark of othering
– Ancient and/or contemporary care of the self beyond the self
– Ancient care ethics beyond the Greco-Roman world
– Care as a challenge to ancient and/or contemporary notions of selfhood
– Selfless self as an alternative response to ancient and/or contemporary self-care

Please send your anonymized abstract (300-500 words) in PDF format to selflesscare (at) upce.czby the 15th of December 2025, together with a title, 5 keywords, and a list of no more than six references (not to be included in the word count). In the body of the email please add a short biography of yourself. Papers should not exceed 30 minutes, followed by 15 minutes of discussion. A notification of acceptance should be available by the end of December 2025. We are unable to provide funding, but we encourage you to consult with your home institutions.

Source: Gender Campus

CfP: Underprivileged Bodies: Marginality and Minority in Europe, 1850-1939 (07/2026, Wrocław); by: 15.01.2026

Ekaterina Oleshkevich, Zuzanna Kołodziejska-Smagała, and Anna Kałużna; Department of Jewish Studies, Wrocław Univ. (Web)

Time: 06.-08.07.2026
Venue: Department of Jewish Studies, Wrocław Univ.
Proposals by: 15.01.2026

From the rise of industry to the emergence of racial science and eugenics, from the expansion of empires to the contestation of class, gender, and disability norms—the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries witnessed a profound transformation in the ways bodies were perceived, categorized, and regulated. This transformation was driven by the increasing entanglement of state power, medical knowledge, and culture in the definition of bodily norms and the disciplining of deviant bodies. Scientific discourses strove to codify human difference, often along biological or racial lines; social institutions—from schools and hospitals to asylums and prisons—intervened in the everyday lives of the young, the poor, the sick, and the deviant; and both popular and elite, textual and visual cultures became invested in delineating the “fit” and “unfit,” the “civilized” and the “primitive,” the “normal” and the “abnormal.”
This conference seeks to explore how marginalized and minority bodies were imagined, categorized, and governed in Europe between 1850 and 1939, as well as how individuals and communities experienced, performed, and contested these regimes of representation and control. We welcome papers that address a broad range of minorities—including ethnic, religious, gender, class, age, sexual, and disabled communities—but we place particular emphasis on the Jewish body as a key site of modern European anxieties, fantasies, and negotiations. We are also interested in exploring diversity within Jewish society itself, including the experiences of Jewish women, children, the poor, migrants, or religious and cultural sub-groups who were subject to multiple layers of marginalization.

Topics may include (but are not limited to):
– Visual and scientific representations of Jewish and other minority bodies—by the minorities themselves or through dominant discourses
– Minority and marginalized bodies in institutional settings: prisons, asylums, schools, hospitals, poorhouses
– Gendered and queer embodiments Continue reading