Interdisziplinäres Netzwerk für ein Handbuch zur Kulturgeschichte der Jagd; Laura Beck (Univ. of Bremen), Maurice Saß (Alanus Univ.), and Thomas Widlok (Univ. of Cologne) (Web)

Time: 19.-21.03.2026
Venue: Alanus Univ., Alfter, Germany
Proposals by: 31.08.2025

Hunting can be understood as an activity performed by human subjects aiming for the death of animal subjects defined as ‘prey’, thereby creating a lethal hierarchy whose symbolic quality is transferable to a variety of social and symbolical spheres. This specific perspective on hunting has been prevalent in areas such as literary studies, cultural studies and historical disciplines for the last decade. Foregrounding the hierarchical implications of hunting has proven to be useful when it comes to the critical deconstruction of classist, sexist, racist and other forms of discrimination brought forth, upheld and legitimized by hunting and (scholarly, artistic, literary etc.) hunting discourses.
Despite the importance of this perspective, its implied universalism has a problematic quality as it masks a certain provinciality. Furthermore, its tendency to conceive of hunting as a primarily human affair and to describe animals merely as passive victims without any agency whatsoever is (involuntarily) steeped in speciesism and ignores the complicated and (in Hegelian terms) dialectical nature of hunting. The aim of the workshop is to focus hunting via the lens of animal agency, maybe even perspective, and to illustrate the diversity of constellations in which hunting is and has been described as an experience shared by humans and animals and based on mutual if not necessarily reciprocal dependencies. We therefore welcome papers that examine local artefacts, practices and narratives of hunting, that address the moments of dialogue, interaction, shared situationality between species, that understand humans as part of an animal community, and that conceive of hunting as a physical and cognitive immersion in the more-than-human interconnectedness of an ecosystem. At the same time, it is important to approach the plurality of animal perspectives in the sense of an animated history, and to differentiate both the hunted animals (e.g. according to their defensiveness, their ‚charisma‘ or their privileged perception as individuals or collectives) and the hunting companion species (e.g. according to their function in tracking, chasing, killing, camouflaging, attracting or transporting) – and not to forget the Continue reading →